🏭

Decision Dataset Foundry

We structure human judgment, actions, and failures from live operations into datasets for AI improvement.

Service Overview

Decision Dataset Foundry intentionally creates, captures, and normalizes tacit knowledge, reasoning, failure cases, and field context during live operations, then turns them into proprietary, model-ready data assets.

Across procurement, marketing, CS, real estate, commerce, health, and more, we capture and normalize real decisions (Go/No-Go), scoring, failure reasons, and execution outcomes into model-trainable decision datasets.

Key Benefits

Unlock performance gains with non-public judgment/failure data
Build hard-to-copy proprietary datasets
Improve alerts, hold decisions, and recommendations from failure patterns
Expand decision automation gradually and safely
Extract cross-domain strategic insights
Create long-term lock-in as data and models compound

Process

1

Define domain and judgment points (recommend/select/execute/stop/fail)

2

Design schema, labels, collection UI, and logging policy

3

Build collection pipeline across APIs/logs/dashboard/tagging/database

4

Run labeling operations with rule-based first pass and human QA

5

Package/evaluate dataset with sampling, bias checks, and quality report

6

Connect to training and continuously improve operations

Deliverables

Decision Event Schema v1
Labeling Guideline (failure reasons, risk tags, rationale templates)
Dataset Package (train/valid/test + data dictionary)
Data Quality Report (missing/duplicates/bias/consistency)
Model Improvement Plan (data-to-model KPI loop)
Governance & Privacy Note (consent/de-identification/retention)

Service Information

⏱️ Implementation Period
4-12 weeks
👤 Human Resources
3-6 hours/week
🎯 Suitable Organization
Teams where recommendation/judgment is core, teams blocked by public-data limits, and orgs reducing failure/churn
📋 Prerequisites
At least one live workflow/MVP with real decisions, outcome logging structure, and data consent/security principles

Self-Diagnosis Checklist

📋 Suitable Cases

  • Procurement/bidding: recommendation -> Go/No-Go -> execution -> success/failure for better Fit Score
  • Real estate: listing score/risk judgment linked with field outcomes to improve prediction
  • Commerce seller ops: item-selection decisions linked to margin/risk and sales outcomes

⚠️ Unsuitable Cases

  • Idea stage with little/no real decision execution
  • Organizations unable to establish consent and data-security practices

Design Approach

AI:

Rule-based first-pass tagging, similar-case retrieval, baseline scoring, and data-quality checks

⚠️ Human:

Approve label definitions, run sampling QA, set KPI targets, and govern sensitive-data policy

Not Working:

No outcome capture, unstable label criteria, or requests for unsafe collection without de-identification

Real Implementation Case

Before

Humans made decisions, but reasons and outcomes were not captured, so AI did not improve

After

Judgment, failure, and outcomes accumulate as datasets, continuously improving model accuracy and automation

⚠️ Early schema design is critical because failure definitions and outcome metrics differ by domain.

Verification Results

51
Verified Companies
0
Incidents
Verification Period: Continuous operation model (project duration varies, dataset accumulation is ongoing)

Service Information

Project Duration

Initial build 4-6 weeks, stabilization 8-12 weeks

Price

Scope-based pricing by domain count and labeling complexity (PoC -> scale contract recommended)

Implementation Period

4-12 weeks

Human Resources

3-6 hours/week

Suitable Organization

Teams where recommendation/judgment is core, teams blocked by public-data limits, and orgs reducing failure/churn

Verification Results

Verified Companies51
Incidents0
Verification Period: Continuous operation model (project duration varies, dataset accumulation is ongoing)

Main Services

  • Decision-event schema design: standardize Go/No-Go, score (0-100), risk tags, rationale text, and outcomes
  • Failure/churn/hold data generation: collect why it failed or paused via structured + narrative inputs
  • Cross-domain normalization: map domain-specific judgments into common features
  • Human-in-the-Loop labeling: auto classification + human review for high-quality labels
  • Training dataset packaging: train/valid/test split with quality metrics
  • Model improvement loop: prediction -> execution -> outcome -> retraining